War and Peace
Introduction
War and peace are enduring themes that have profoundly shaped human history and continue to influence global affairs. Within Christian ethics, these concepts raise complex questions about morality, justice, and the role of believers in a world often marked by conflict. To navigate these issues effectively, it's essential to define key terms such as Just War Theory, Pacifism, Activism, and Selectivism. This study aims to explore the ethical considerations of war and peace from a biblical and theological perspective, providing a detailed examination of scriptural teachings, historical viewpoints, ethical theories, and practical applications that guide Christians in understanding and responding to these critical issues.
Significance of War and Peace in Christian Ethics
War and peace are perennial subjects within Christian ethics, reflecting humanity's struggle between violence and reconciliation, justice and oppression. These themes are not only historical but also resonate in contemporary contexts, where conflicts persist and the pursuit of peace remains a pressing concern. Christian ethics seeks to navigate these dichotomies by grounding responses in biblical teachings, emphasizing the pursuit of justice, the sanctity of life, and the transformative power of the Holy Spirit.
1. Defining Key Terms
1.1 Just War Theory
Just War Theory is a philosophical and theological framework that outlines the conditions under which engaging in war can be morally justifiable. It seeks to reconcile the necessity of war with ethical considerations, providing criteria to evaluate the morality of military action.
Origins and Development:
- Augustine of Hippo (354–430 AD): Articulated the idea that war could be morally justified under certain circumstances, emphasizing love and justice.
- Thomas Aquinas (1225–1274 AD): Expanded on Augustine's ideas in Summa Theologica, formalizing the principles of Just War Theory.
Key Principles of Just War Theory:
- Just Cause: War must confront a real and substantial wrong, such as defense against aggression.
- Legitimate Authority: Only duly constituted public authorities may wage war.
- Right Intention: The intention behind the war must be promoting good or correcting a wrong.
- Last Resort: All peaceful alternatives must have been exhausted before resorting to war.
- Probability of Success: There must be a reasonable chance of achieving the war's objectives.
- Proportionality: The anticipated benefits must outweigh the expected harm.
- Discrimination: Combatants must distinguish between combatants and non-combatants, avoiding harm to innocent civilians.
1.2 Pacifism
Pacifism is the belief that all forms of violence, including war, are unjustifiable under any circumstances, and that disputes should be settled by peaceful means. Pacifism emphasizes nonviolence and is often rooted in the teachings of Jesus on loving one's enemies and turning the other cheek.
Types of Pacifism:
- Absolute Pacifism: Rejects all forms of violence, even in self-defense.
- Conditional Pacifism: Generally opposes war but may accept it as a last resort in extreme cases.
- Nonviolent Resistance: Advocates active engagement in social justice issues through nonviolent means.
1.3 Activism
Activism in the context of Christian ethics on war refers to the belief that Christians have a duty to participate in war when it is deemed just, often based on Just War Theory. Activists support involvement in war efforts to combat injustice, defend the innocent, and promote peace through the use of force when necessary. It also holds the understanding that Christians are to support every military effort whichever their country declares war. Since the Word of God says in Romans 13:1-7 that we are to submit to the political leaders that are established over us, we assume that that these leaders have access to better information than we do.
Characteristics of Activism:
- Moral Responsibility: Upholds that Christians should actively oppose evil, even if it involves military action.
- Commitment to Justice: Emphasizes the pursuit of justice as a Christian duty.
- Engagement in Society: Encourages participation in societal structures, including the military, to effect positive change.
1.4 Selectivism (Selective Conscientious Objection)
Selectivism is the position that accepts the use of force or participation in war under certain conditions but allows individuals to object selectively to particular wars they consider unjust. Selectivists evaluate each conflict on a case-by-case basis, applying ethical criteria to determine whether participation aligns with Christian morals.
Key Aspects of Selectivism:
- Individual Discernment: Emphasizes personal responsibility in evaluating the justice of each war.
- Moral Autonomy: Recognizes the individual's conscience in making ethical decisions about participation.
- Alignment with Ethical Principles: Participation is contingent upon the war meeting Just War criteria.
2. Biblical Foundations
2.1 Old Testament Perspectives on War
Understanding the concept of war in the Old Testament, particularly in Deuteronomy 20:1–20, is essential for a comprehensive exploration of Christian ethics concerning war and peace. The passage provides detailed instructions for Israel regarding warfare, known as Yahweh War. This term refers to wars commanded and directed by God (Yahweh) Himself, distinguishing them from secular or imperialistic wars pursued for expansion or personal gain.
In Deuteronomy 20, Moses delivers a sermon outlining God's specific instructions for conducting warfare. Unlike other ancient Near Eastern texts that reflect human opinions or royal decrees, this chapter presents rules that are directly attributed to God's commands.
- Divine Origin: The instructions are not mere human strategies but are given by Yahweh, emphasizing His sovereignty and authority over Israel's actions.
- Purposeful Warfare: The wars are not for territorial expansion or personal ambition but are conducted in obedience to God's specific directives for judgment and the fulfillment of His promises.
2.1.1 Divine Commands for War
In the Old Testament, God sometimes commands Israel to engage in warfare. A prominent example is the conquest of Canaan under Joshua's leadership (Joshua 6–12).
Purpose of the Conquest:
- Divine Judgment: The Canaanites' practices, including idolatry and immorality, warranted God's judgment (Deuteronomy 9:4–5).
- Fulfillment of Promises: God promised the land to Abraham's descendants (Genesis 15:18–21).
Ethical Considerations:
- Holiness: Israel was to be set apart, avoiding the corrupting influences of pagan nations (Leviticus 20:26).
- Obedience: Warfare was undertaken in obedience to God's specific commands, not personal ambition.
2.1.2 Protective and Defensive Wars
Israel often engaged in wars to defend itself against aggressors.
Examples:
- David and Goliath: David confronts the Philistine threat (1 Samuel 17).
- Various Judges: Leaders like Gideon and Samson defend Israel from oppression.
Dependence on God:
- Divine Guidance: Battles were fought under God's direction (Judges 7:2–7).
- Trust in God's Strength: Reliance on God rather than military might (Psalm 20:7).
2.2 New Testament Perspectives on Peace
2.2.1 Teachings of Jesus
Jesus emphasizes love, forgiveness, and nonviolence.
Sermon on the Mount:
- Peacemaking: "Blessed are the peacemakers, for they will be called children of God" (Matthew 5:9).
- Love for Enemies: "Love your enemies and pray for those who persecute you" (Matthew 5:44).
Non-Retaliation:
- Turning the Other Cheek: "If anyone slaps you on the right cheek, turn to them the other also" (Matthew 5:39).
- Forgiveness: Emphasizes forgiving others as God forgives us (Matthew 6:14–15).
2.2.2 Apostolic Teachings
The apostles continue Jesus' message of peace.
Paul's Exhortations:
- Live Peaceably: "If it is possible, as far as it depends on you, live at peace with everyone" (Romans 12:18).
- Overcoming Evil with Good: "Do not be overcome by evil, but overcome evil with good" (Romans 12:21).
Peter's Guidance:
- Pursuing Peace: "Seek peace and pursue it" (1 Peter 3:11).
2.3 The Tension Between War and Peace in Scripture
The Bible presents a nuanced view that includes both divine-sanctioned wars and calls for peace.
Continuity and Discontinuity:
- Progressive Revelation: Understanding the unfolding of God's plan from the Old to the New Testament.
Jesus and Violence:
- Cleansing the Temple: Jesus drives out merchants (John 2:13–16), showing righteous indignation without endorsing violence as a norm.
Role of Government:
- Authority to Use Force: "For the one in authority is God's servant... an agent of wrath to bring punishment on the wrongdoer" (Romans 13:4).
3. Theological Perspectives
3.1 The Just War Tradition
Just War Theory, as previously defined, provides a framework for evaluating the morality of war.
Application in Christian Ethics:
- Moral Justification: War can be morally acceptable if it meets the criteria outlined in the theory.
- Guidance for Activism: Supports the activist position that Christians may participate in just wars.
Critiques:
- Potential for Abuse: Governments may misuse Just War Theory to justify unjust conflicts.
- Modern Challenges: Advanced weaponry and unconventional warfare complicate adherence to just war principles.
3.2 Pacifism
Pacifism emphasizes the commitment to nonviolence based on Jesus' teachings.
Biblical Basis:
- Sermon on the Mount: Calls for love and non-retaliation.
- Jesus' Example: Submission to suffering without resistance.
Ethical Stance:
- Imitation of Christ: Upholding peace even in the face of injustice.
- Nonviolent Resistance: Engaging in active, peaceful opposition to evil.
3.3 Activism and Selectivism in Theological Context
3.3.1 Activism
Theological Justification:
- Defending Justice: Belief that Christians are called to confront evil actively.
- Biblical Examples: David fighting Goliath; God using Israel to execute judgment.
Ethical Implications:
- Moral Responsibility: Participation in war when it meets Just War criteria.
- Support for Just Wars: Aligning military action with ethical principles.
3.3.2 Selectivism
Theological Justification:
- Individual Conscience: Emphasizes personal discernment in the light of Scripture.
- Moral Autonomy: Recognizes that not all wars are just, and Christians must evaluate each case.
Ethical Implications:
- Selective Participation: Choosing to participate or object based on the war's adherence to ethical criteria.
- Balance Between Pacifism and Activism: Accepts the possibility of just wars but allows for conscientious objection.
4. Ethical Theories on War and Peace
4.1 Just War Theory
Role in Activism:
- Framework for Ethical Participation: Guides Christians in determining when to support or engage in war.
Challenges for Selectivists:
- Applying Criteria: Evaluating each conflict against Just War principles to decide on participation.
4.2 Pacifism
Moral Consistency:
- Absolute Nonviolence: Pacifists reject war entirely, prioritizing adherence to Jesus' teachings.
Critiques from Activists:
- Practicality and Responsibility: Concerns about allowing injustice to prevail.
4.3 Christian Realism
Integration with Selectivism:
- Moral Complexity: Recognizes the need for nuanced decisions in a flawed world.
Ethical Balancing Act:
- Navigating Between Ideals: Balancing pacifist ideals with the realities that sometimes necessitate force.
5. Ethical Considerations
5.1 The Sanctity of Life
Shared Concern:
- Pacifists, Activists, and Selectivists all value human life, influencing their stances on war and peace.
Differing Approaches:
- Pacifists: Avoid taking life under any circumstances.
- Activists and Selectivists: May support war to protect life and justice.
5.2 Love for Neighbor and Enemy
Ethical Imperative:
- Pacifism: Emphasizes loving enemies by refusing violence.
- Activism: Seeks to protect neighbors from harm, even if it requires force.
5.3 Justice and Peace
Common Goal:
- All positions aim to promote justice and peace but differ in methods.
Means vs. Ends:
- Pacifists: Advocate peaceful means only.
- Activists and Selectivists: May accept war as a means to achieve peace and justice.
6. Practical Applications
6.1 Decision-Making for Individuals
6.1.1 Individual Conscience
-
Moral Responsibility:
- Personal Convictions: Individuals must assess their participation in war based on conscience informed by Scripture.
-
Conscientious Objection:
- Legal Provision: Many countries allow for conscientious objection to military service.
- Alternative Service: Engaging in non-combatant roles or civil service.
6.1.2 Corporate Discernment
-
Church Community:
- Guidance and Support: Helping individuals discern their stance.
-
Spiritual Disciplines:
- Prayer and Fasting: Seeking God's direction in difficult decisions.
6.2 The Role of the Church
6.2.1 Conflict Resolution
-
Mediation and Dialogue:
- Facilitating Communication: Helping conflicting parties understand each other.
-
Reconciliation Ministries:
- Healing Relationships: Working towards forgiveness and restoration.
6.2.2 Underlying Determinants
-
Addressing Root Causes:
- Poverty, Inequality, Oppression: Tackling systemic issues that lead to conflict.
-
Advocacy and Service:
- Supporting the Vulnerable: Providing aid and defending the rights of marginalized groups.
7. Conclusion
7.1 Integrating Diverse Perspectives
-
Understanding Each Position:
- Value in Each Approach: Recognizing the biblical and ethical foundations of Pacifism, Activism, and Selectivism.
-
Unified Goal:
- Pursuit of Peace and Justice: Despite differences, all aim to reflect Christ's teachings.
7.2 Moving Forward
-
Continued Dialogue:
- Encouraging Thoughtful Discussion: Fostering understanding within the Christian community.
-
Commitment to Ethical Living:
- Applying Principles: Living out convictions with integrity and compassion.
7.3 Closing Thoughts
War and peace present profound ethical challenges that compel Christians to reflect deeply on their responsibilities in a world fraught with conflict and injustice. This comprehensive study has delved into the biblical foundations, theological perspectives, historical examples, ethical theories, and practical applications that shape Christian ethics concerning war and peace. By defining key terms such as Just War Theory, Pacifism, Activism, and Selectivism, we have illuminated the diverse approaches within the Christian tradition.
The Scriptures offer a nuanced portrayal of war and peace. The Old Testament recounts instances where God commanded warfare for purposes of justice and the fulfillment of divine promises. Conversely, the New Testament emphasizes the teachings of Jesus on love, forgiveness, and nonviolence, urging believers to be peacemakers and to love their enemies. This tension requires careful interpretation, recognizing the continuity of God's character and the progression of His revelation.
Just War Theory provides a framework for discerning when war may be morally justifiable, emphasizing criteria such as just cause, legitimate authority, right intention, and proportionality. It serves as a guide for those who believe that participation in war can be an expression of justice and protection of the innocent.
Pacifism, grounded in the teachings and example of Jesus, advocates for nonviolence and the resolution of conflicts through peaceful means. It challenges believers to embody the radical love of Christ, even in the face of aggression.
Activism and Selectivism offer additional perspectives, with Activism supporting the notion that Christians have a duty to participate in just wars, and Selectivism allowing for individual discernment and conscientious objection based on the moral evaluation of specific conflicts.
Ethical considerations such as the sanctity of life, love for neighbor and enemy, and the pursuit of justice and peace are central to Christian engagement with issues of war and peace. The role of the church is vital in providing guidance, fostering unity amid diverse convictions, and modeling Christ-like responses to conflict.
In navigating these complex issues, Christians are called to:
- Engage in Continual Dialogue: Foster open discussions within the faith community to understand different perspectives.
- Seek Guidance from Scripture and the Holy Spirit: Ground ethical decisions in biblical principles and spiritual discernment.
- Commit to Ethical Living: Apply convictions with integrity, compassion, and a focus on embodying the love of Christ.
- Promote Peace and Justice: Actively work towards reconciliation, healing, and the alleviation of injustice in the world.
Ultimately, Christians are called to be ambassadors of Christ, reflecting His peace and justice in a troubled world. By thoughtfully engaging with the ethical dimensions of war and peace, believers can contribute to a legacy of faithfulness that honors God and seeks the well-being of all humanity.
Bibliography
- The Holy Bible, New International Version (NIV).
- Augustine of Hippo. City of God. Translated by Henry Bettenson, Penguin Classics, 2003.
- Aquinas, Thomas. Summa Theologica. Translated by the Fathers of the English Dominican Province, Christian Classics, 1981.
- Bonhoeffer, Dietrich. The Cost of Discipleship. Translated by R. H. Fuller, Touchstone, 1995.
- Niebuhr, Reinhold. Moral Man and Immoral Society. Charles Scribner's Sons, 1932.
- King Jr., Martin Luther. Strength to Love. Harper & Row, 1963.
- Yoder, John Howard. The Politics of Jesus. Eerdmans Publishing, 1972.
- Ramsey, Paul. War and the Christian Conscience: How Shall Modern War Be Conducted Justly? Duke University Press, 1961.
- Hauerwas, Stanley. The Peaceable Kingdom: A Primer in Christian Ethics. University of Notre Dame Press, 1983.
- Holmes, Arthur F., editor. War and Christian Ethics: Classic and Contemporary Readings on the Morality of War. Baker Academic, 2005.
- Johnson, James Turner. Just War Tradition and the Restraint of War: A Moral and Historical Inquiry. Princeton University Press, 1981.
- Biggar, Nigel. In Defence of War. Oxford University Press, 2013.
- Elshtain, Jean Bethke. Just War Against Terror: The Burden of American Power in a Violent World. Basic Books, 2003.
- Sider, Ronald J. Christ and Violence. Wipf and Stock Publishers, 1979.
- Stassen, Glen H., and David P. Gushee. Kingdom Ethics: Following Jesus in Contemporary Context. InterVarsity Press, 2003.